The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for November 1, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · November 1, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Elizabeth Tower vs Great Pyramid

0.6931×
Reference · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m
Target · height
Elizabeth Tower 96 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6931. The target’s height is approximately 0.6931× the reference’s height.

Elizabeth Tower is about 70 percent of the Great Pyramid’s present height.

Replay this comparison →
02

Football pitch vs Brooklyn Bridge span

0.2159×
Reference · span
Brooklyn Bridge span 486.3 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2159. The target’s length is approximately 0.2159× the reference’s span.

Almost five standard football pitches fit across the Brooklyn Bridge’s main span.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
03

Blue whale vs Space Shuttle

0.8038×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · length
Blue whale 29.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8038. The target’s length is approximately 0.8038× the reference’s length.

A record-size blue whale is only several metres shorter than a Space Shuttle orbiter.

An upper-end body length, not the average size of all blue whales.

Replay this comparison →
04

Adult vs Door

0.8374×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Adult 1.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8374. The target’s height is approximately 0.8374× the reference’s height.

A typical adult is roughly five sixths the height of a standard interior door.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
05

Space Shuttle vs Boeing 747-8

0.4875×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4875. The target’s length is approximately 0.4875× the reference’s length.

The Space Shuttle orbiter is just under half as long as a Boeing 747-8.

Orbiter length, not the launch stack.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · November 1, 2026Reveal answers +
01

RX-78-2 Gundam vs Space Shuttle

0.4839×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4839. The target’s height is approximately 0.4839× the reference’s length.

The original RX-78-2 Gundam is about half the length of a Space Shuttle orbiter when stood upright.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · November 1, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Japan vs United Kingdom

3.109×
Reference · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 3.109. The target’s north–south span is approximately 3.109× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s long island arc spans a little over three times the United Kingdom from north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

United Kingdom vs France

1.016×
Reference · east–west span
France 950 km
Target · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.016. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.016× the reference’s east–west span.

The United Kingdom’s north–south reach is close to metropolitan France’s east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +