The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 31, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 31, 2026Reveal answers +
02

Eiffel Tower vs Burj Khalifa

0.3986×
Reference · height
Burj Khalifa 828 m
Target · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3986. The target’s height is approximately 0.3986× the reference’s height.

The Eiffel Tower is about two fifths as tall as the Burj Khalifa.

Total height including the antenna.

Replay this comparison →
03

Orca vs City bus

0.6667×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6667. The target’s length is approximately 0.6667× the reference’s length.

A large orca is around two thirds the length of a standard city bus.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
04

Empire State vs Burj Khalifa

0.5353×
Reference · height
Burj Khalifa 828 m
Target · height
Empire State 443.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.5353. The target’s height is approximately 0.5353× the reference’s height.

The Empire State Building reaches just over half the Burj Khalifa’s architectural height.

Full height to tip, not roof height.

Replay this comparison →
05

Football pitch vs Brooklyn Bridge span

0.2159×
Reference · span
Brooklyn Bridge span 486.3 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2159. The target’s length is approximately 0.2159× the reference’s span.

Almost five standard football pitches fit across the Brooklyn Bridge’s main span.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 31, 2026Reveal answers +
01

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 31, 2026Reveal answers +
01

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

India vs Japan

1.071×
Reference · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km
Target · north–south span
India 3,214 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.071. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.071× the reference’s north–south span.

India and Japan have comparable north–south extents despite their very different outlines.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +