The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 8, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 8, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Titanic vs Eiffel Tower

0.8155×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · length
Titanic 269.1 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8155. The target’s length is approximately 0.8155× the reference’s height.

Laid on end, Titanic would reach more than four fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s height.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
02

Boeing 747-8 vs Football pitch

0.7267×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.7267. The target’s length is approximately 0.7267× the reference’s length.

A Boeing 747-8 is nearly three quarters the length of a standard 105-metre football pitch.

The 747-8 variant; other 747 models have different lengths.

Replay this comparison →
03

Football pitch vs Titanic

0.3902×
Reference · length
Titanic 269.1 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3902. The target’s length is approximately 0.3902× the reference’s length.

Titanic was longer than two and a half football pitches placed end to end.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
04

Orca vs City bus

0.6667×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6667. The target’s length is approximately 0.6667× the reference’s length.

A large orca is around two thirds the length of a standard city bus.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 8, 2026Reveal answers +
01

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Bumblebee vs Elephant

1.485×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.485. The target’s height is approximately 1.485× the reference’s height.

This screen-scale Bumblebee stands around one and a half times an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

King Kong vs Statue of Liberty

1.104×
Reference · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.104. The target’s height is approximately 1.104× the reference’s height.

The MonsterVerse version of King Kong stands a little taller than the Statue of Liberty including its pedestal.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 8, 2026Reveal answers +
01

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

India vs Japan

1.071×
Reference · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km
Target · north–south span
India 3,214 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.071. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.071× the reference’s north–south span.

India and Japan have comparable north–south extents despite their very different outlines.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +