The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 7, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 7, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Football pitch vs Titanic

0.3902×
Reference · length
Titanic 269.1 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3902. The target’s length is approximately 0.3902× the reference’s length.

Titanic was longer than two and a half football pitches placed end to end.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
04

Saturn vs Jupiter

0.8329×
Reference · diameter
Jupiter 139,820 km
Target · diameter
Saturn 116,460 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8329. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.8329× the reference’s diameter.

Saturn is close to Jupiter in width, even though its mass is far lower.

Diameter excludes the rings.

Replay this comparison →
05

Titanic vs Eiffel Tower

0.8155×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · length
Titanic 269.1 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8155. The target’s length is approximately 0.8155× the reference’s height.

Laid on end, Titanic would reach more than four fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s height.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 7, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Bumblebee vs Elephant

1.485×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.485. The target’s height is approximately 1.485× the reference’s height.

This screen-scale Bumblebee stands around one and a half times an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 7, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

New Zealand vs Madagascar

1×
Reference · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1× the reference’s north–south span.

New Zealand and Madagascar have remarkably similar overall north–south spans.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +