The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 28, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 28, 2026Reveal answers +
01

General Sherman vs Elizabeth Tower

0.8729×
Reference · height
Elizabeth Tower 96 m
Target · height
General Sherman 83.8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8729. The target’s height is approximately 0.8729× the reference’s height.

The General Sherman sequoia stands only about twelve metres shorter than Elizabeth Tower.

Replay this comparison →
02

City bus vs Boeing 747-8

0.1573×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
City bus 12 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.1573. The target’s length is approximately 0.1573× the reference’s length.

A 747-8 is more than six standard city buses long.

A representative 12 m single-deck city bus; other models vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Elizabeth Tower vs Great Pyramid

0.6931×
Reference · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m
Target · height
Elizabeth Tower 96 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6931. The target’s height is approximately 0.6931× the reference’s height.

Elizabeth Tower is about 70 percent of the Great Pyramid’s present height.

Replay this comparison →
04

Saturn vs Jupiter

0.8329×
Reference · diameter
Jupiter 139,820 km
Target · diameter
Saturn 116,460 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8329. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.8329× the reference’s diameter.

Saturn is close to Jupiter in width, even though its mass is far lower.

Diameter excludes the rings.

Replay this comparison →
05

Blue whale vs Space Shuttle

0.8038×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · length
Blue whale 29.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8038. The target’s length is approximately 0.8038× the reference’s length.

A record-size blue whale is only several metres shorter than a Space Shuttle orbiter.

An upper-end body length, not the average size of all blue whales.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 28, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 28, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Japan vs United Kingdom

3.109×
Reference · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 3.109. The target’s north–south span is approximately 3.109× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s long island arc spans a little over three times the United Kingdom from north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +