The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 23, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 23, 2026Reveal answers +
01

City bus vs Boeing 747-8

0.1573×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
City bus 12 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.1573. The target’s length is approximately 0.1573× the reference’s length.

A 747-8 is more than six standard city buses long.

A representative 12 m single-deck city bus; other models vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Blue whale vs City bus

2.492×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Blue whale 29.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.492. The target’s length is approximately 2.492× the reference’s length.

The largest blue whales can stretch to roughly two and a half standard city buses.

An upper-end body length, not the average size of all blue whales.

Replay this comparison →
05

Eiffel Tower vs Burj Khalifa

0.3986×
Reference · height
Burj Khalifa 828 m
Target · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3986. The target’s height is approximately 0.3986× the reference’s height.

The Eiffel Tower is about two fifths as tall as the Burj Khalifa.

Total height including the antenna.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 23, 2026Reveal answers +
01

King Kong vs Statue of Liberty

1.104×
Reference · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.104. The target’s height is approximately 1.104× the reference’s height.

The MonsterVerse version of King Kong stands a little taller than the Statue of Liberty including its pedestal.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

RX-78-2 Gundam vs Space Shuttle

0.4839×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4839. The target’s height is approximately 0.4839× the reference’s length.

The original RX-78-2 Gundam is about half the length of a Space Shuttle orbiter when stood upright.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Bumblebee vs Elephant

1.485×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.485. The target’s height is approximately 1.485× the reference’s height.

This screen-scale Bumblebee stands around one and a half times an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 23, 2026Reveal answers +
01

United Kingdom vs France

1.016×
Reference · east–west span
France 950 km
Target · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.016. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.016× the reference’s east–west span.

The United Kingdom’s north–south reach is close to metropolitan France’s east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

India vs Japan

1.071×
Reference · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km
Target · north–south span
India 3,214 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.071. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.071× the reference’s north–south span.

India and Japan have comparable north–south extents despite their very different outlines.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +