The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 18, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 18, 2026Reveal answers +
02

City bus vs Boeing 747-8

0.1573×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
City bus 12 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.1573. The target’s length is approximately 0.1573× the reference’s length.

A 747-8 is more than six standard city buses long.

A representative 12 m single-deck city bus; other models vary.

Replay this comparison →
04

Great Pyramid vs Eiffel Tower

0.4197×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4197. The target’s height is approximately 0.4197× the reference’s height.

The Great Pyramid’s current height is a little over two fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
05

Statue of Liberty vs Eiffel Tower

0.2818×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2818. The target’s height is approximately 0.2818× the reference’s height.

Including its pedestal, the Statue of Liberty is less than one third the Eiffel Tower’s height.

Ground to torch, including the pedestal.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 18, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 18, 2026Reveal answers +
01

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

New Zealand vs Madagascar

1×
Reference · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1× the reference’s north–south span.

New Zealand and Madagascar have remarkably similar overall north–south spans.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +