The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 15, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 15, 2026Reveal answers +
01

City bus vs Boeing 747-8

0.1573×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
City bus 12 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.1573. The target’s length is approximately 0.1573× the reference’s length.

A 747-8 is more than six standard city buses long.

A representative 12 m single-deck city bus; other models vary.

Replay this comparison →
02

Orca vs City bus

0.6667×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6667. The target’s length is approximately 0.6667× the reference’s length.

A large orca is around two thirds the length of a standard city bus.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Boeing 747-8 vs Football pitch

0.7267×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.7267. The target’s length is approximately 0.7267× the reference’s length.

A Boeing 747-8 is nearly three quarters the length of a standard 105-metre football pitch.

The 747-8 variant; other 747 models have different lengths.

Replay this comparison →
04

Great Pyramid vs Eiffel Tower

0.4197×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4197. The target’s height is approximately 0.4197× the reference’s height.

The Great Pyramid’s current height is a little over two fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
05

Space Shuttle vs Boeing 747-8

0.4875×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4875. The target’s length is approximately 0.4875× the reference’s length.

The Space Shuttle orbiter is just under half as long as a Boeing 747-8.

Orbiter length, not the launch stack.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 15, 2026Reveal answers +
01

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

RX-78-2 Gundam vs Space Shuttle

0.4839×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4839. The target’s height is approximately 0.4839× the reference’s length.

The original RX-78-2 Gundam is about half the length of a Space Shuttle orbiter when stood upright.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 15, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

New Zealand vs Madagascar

1×
Reference · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1× the reference’s north–south span.

New Zealand and Madagascar have remarkably similar overall north–south spans.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +