The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 13, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 13, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Great Pyramid vs Eiffel Tower

0.4197×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4197. The target’s height is approximately 0.4197× the reference’s height.

The Great Pyramid’s current height is a little over two fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
02

Orca vs City bus

0.6667×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6667. The target’s length is approximately 0.6667× the reference’s length.

A large orca is around two thirds the length of a standard city bus.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Space Shuttle vs Boeing 747-8

0.4875×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4875. The target’s length is approximately 0.4875× the reference’s length.

The Space Shuttle orbiter is just under half as long as a Boeing 747-8.

Orbiter length, not the launch stack.

Replay this comparison →
04

Blue whale vs Space Shuttle

0.8038×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · length
Blue whale 29.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8038. The target’s length is approximately 0.8038× the reference’s length.

A record-size blue whale is only several metres shorter than a Space Shuttle orbiter.

An upper-end body length, not the average size of all blue whales.

Replay this comparison →
05

Adult vs Door

0.8374×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Adult 1.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8374. The target’s height is approximately 0.8374× the reference’s height.

A typical adult is roughly five sixths the height of a standard interior door.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 13, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

RX-78-2 Gundam vs Space Shuttle

0.4839×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4839. The target’s height is approximately 0.4839× the reference’s length.

The original RX-78-2 Gundam is about half the length of a Space Shuttle orbiter when stood upright.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Bumblebee vs Elephant

1.485×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.485. The target’s height is approximately 1.485× the reference’s height.

This screen-scale Bumblebee stands around one and a half times an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 13, 2026Reveal answers +
01

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +