The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for October 2, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · October 2, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Door vs Elephant

0.6152×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Door 2.03 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6152. The target’s height is approximately 0.6152× the reference’s height.

A standard door reaches a little over three fifths of an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Tennis ball vs Basketball

0.2803×
Reference · diameter
Basketball 23.9 cm
Target · diameter
Tennis ball 6.7 cm

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2803. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.2803× the reference’s diameter.

A tennis ball’s diameter is a little over one quarter of a size 7 basketball’s.

A rounded tennis-ball diameter used for play.

Replay this comparison →
05

Empire State vs Burj Khalifa

0.5353×
Reference · height
Burj Khalifa 828 m
Target · height
Empire State 443.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.5353. The target’s height is approximately 0.5353× the reference’s height.

The Empire State Building reaches just over half the Burj Khalifa’s architectural height.

Full height to tip, not roof height.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · October 2, 2026Reveal answers +
01

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · October 2, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Egypt vs Italy

0.9208×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9208. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9208× the reference’s north–south span.

Egypt’s north–south span is slightly shorter than Italy’s full geographic reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

India vs Japan

1.071×
Reference · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km
Target · north–south span
India 3,214 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.071. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.071× the reference’s north–south span.

India and Japan have comparable north–south extents despite their very different outlines.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +