The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 30, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 30, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Brooklyn Bridge span vs Golden Gate span

0.3799×
Reference · span
Golden Gate span 1.28 km
Target · span
Brooklyn Bridge span 486.3 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3799. The target’s span is approximately 0.3799× the reference’s span.

The Brooklyn Bridge’s main span is under two fifths of the Golden Gate Bridge’s.

Main span, excluding approaches.

Replay this comparison →
02

Orca vs Blue whale

0.2676×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2676. The target’s length is approximately 0.2676× the reference’s length.

A large orca is only around one quarter the length of a record-size blue whale.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Adult vs Door

0.8374×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Adult 1.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8374. The target’s height is approximately 0.8374× the reference’s height.

A typical adult is roughly five sixths the height of a standard interior door.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
04

Polar bear vs King bed

1.232×
Reference · length
King bed 2.03 m
Target · length
Polar bear 2.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.232. The target’s length is approximately 1.232× the reference’s length.

A large polar bear can be longer than a king-size mattress.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 30, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Bumblebee vs Elephant

1.485×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.485. The target’s height is approximately 1.485× the reference’s height.

This screen-scale Bumblebee stands around one and a half times an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 30, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Brazil vs Australia

1.08×
Reference · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km
Target · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.08. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.08× the reference’s east–west span.

Brazil is only modestly wider east to west than mainland Australia and Tasmania together.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

United Kingdom vs France

1.016×
Reference · east–west span
France 950 km
Target · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.016. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.016× the reference’s east–west span.

The United Kingdom’s north–south reach is close to metropolitan France’s east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +