The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 26, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 26, 2026Reveal answers +
02

Polar bear vs King bed

1.232×
Reference · length
King bed 2.03 m
Target · length
Polar bear 2.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.232. The target’s length is approximately 1.232× the reference’s length.

A large polar bear can be longer than a king-size mattress.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
03

Football pitch vs Brooklyn Bridge span

0.2159×
Reference · span
Brooklyn Bridge span 486.3 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2159. The target’s length is approximately 0.2159× the reference’s span.

Almost five standard football pitches fit across the Brooklyn Bridge’s main span.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
04

Saturn vs Jupiter

0.8329×
Reference · diameter
Jupiter 139,820 km
Target · diameter
Saturn 116,460 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8329. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.8329× the reference’s diameter.

Saturn is close to Jupiter in width, even though its mass is far lower.

Diameter excludes the rings.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 26, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Death Star vs Moon

0.0461×
Reference · diameter
Moon 3,474.8 km
Target · diameter
Death Star 160 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.0461. The target’s diameter is approximately 0.0461× the reference’s diameter.

A 160-kilometre Death Star is enormous beside a city, yet tiny compared with the Moon’s diameter.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

King Kong vs Statue of Liberty

1.104×
Reference · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.104. The target’s height is approximately 1.104× the reference’s height.

The MonsterVerse version of King Kong stands a little taller than the Statue of Liberty including its pedestal.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 26, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Australia vs India

1.247×
Reference · north–south span
India 3,214 km
Target · east–west span
Australia 4,007 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.247. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.247× the reference’s north–south span.

Australia is roughly one quarter wider east to west than India is long north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

France vs Iceland

1.9×
Reference · east–west span
Iceland 500 km
Target · east–west span
France 950 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.9. The target’s east–west span is approximately 1.9× the reference’s east–west span.

Metropolitan France is close to twice Iceland’s approximate east–west width.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +