The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 24, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 24, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Football pitch vs Titanic

0.3902×
Reference · length
Titanic 269.1 m
Target · length
Football pitch 105 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3902. The target’s length is approximately 0.3902× the reference’s length.

Titanic was longer than two and a half football pitches placed end to end.

A representative 105 m pitch within the allowed range.

Replay this comparison →
02

Blue whale vs Space Shuttle

0.8038×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · length
Blue whale 29.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.8038. The target’s length is approximately 0.8038× the reference’s length.

A record-size blue whale is only several metres shorter than a Space Shuttle orbiter.

An upper-end body length, not the average size of all blue whales.

Replay this comparison →
03

Brooklyn Bridge span vs Golden Gate span

0.3799×
Reference · span
Golden Gate span 1.28 km
Target · span
Brooklyn Bridge span 486.3 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3799. The target’s span is approximately 0.3799× the reference’s span.

The Brooklyn Bridge’s main span is under two fifths of the Golden Gate Bridge’s.

Main span, excluding approaches.

Replay this comparison →
04

Orca vs Blue whale

0.2676×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Orca 8 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.2676. The target’s length is approximately 0.2676× the reference’s length.

A large orca is only around one quarter the length of a record-size blue whale.

A representative large adult; individual lengths vary.

Replay this comparison →
05

Space Shuttle vs Boeing 747-8

0.4875×
Reference · length
Boeing 747-8 76.3 m
Target · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4875. The target’s length is approximately 0.4875× the reference’s length.

The Space Shuttle orbiter is just under half as long as a Boeing 747-8.

Orbiter length, not the launch stack.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 24, 2026Reveal answers +
01

RX-78-2 Gundam vs Space Shuttle

0.4839×
Reference · length
Space Shuttle 37.2 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4839. The target’s height is approximately 0.4839× the reference’s length.

The original RX-78-2 Gundam is about half the length of a Space Shuttle orbiter when stood upright.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

King Kong vs Statue of Liberty

1.104×
Reference · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.104. The target’s height is approximately 1.104× the reference’s height.

The MonsterVerse version of King Kong stands a little taller than the Statue of Liberty including its pedestal.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

Bumblebee vs Door

2.414×
Reference · height
Door 2.03 m
Target · height
Bumblebee 4.9 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 2.414. The target’s height is approximately 2.414× the reference’s height.

At about 4.9 metres, Bumblebee would stand more than twice as tall as a common interior door.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Jurassic Park T. rex vs City bus

1.017×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.017. The target’s length is approximately 1.017× the reference’s length.

The full-grown Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at roughly the length of a standard city bus.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 24, 2026Reveal answers +
01

India vs Japan

1.071×
Reference · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km
Target · north–south span
India 3,214 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.071. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.071× the reference’s north–south span.

India and Japan have comparable north–south extents despite their very different outlines.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Japan vs United Kingdom

3.109×
Reference · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 3.109. The target’s north–south span is approximately 3.109× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s long island arc spans a little over three times the United Kingdom from north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +