The daily reveal · Past game · UTC

Size It Up Answers for September 16, 2026

Answers for the independent Size It Up Daily game on sizeitup.top. These are not Magnitudle’s daily answers.

ClassicFive comparisons · September 16, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Great Pyramid vs Eiffel Tower

0.4197×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
Great Pyramid 138.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.4197. The target’s height is approximately 0.4197× the reference’s height.

The Great Pyramid’s current height is a little over two fifths of the Eiffel Tower’s.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
02

Polar bear vs King bed

1.232×
Reference · length
King bed 2.03 m
Target · length
Polar bear 2.5 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.232. The target’s length is approximately 1.232× the reference’s length.

A large polar bear can be longer than a king-size mattress.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
04

Eiffel Tower vs Empire State

0.7446×
Reference · height
Empire State 443.2 m
Target · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.7446. The target’s height is approximately 0.7446× the reference’s height.

The Eiffel Tower is about three quarters of the Empire State Building’s full height to tip.

Total height including the antenna.

Replay this comparison →
05

Door vs Elephant

0.6152×
Reference · height
Elephant 3.3 m
Target · height
Door 2.03 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.6152. The target’s height is approximately 0.6152× the reference’s height.

A standard door reaches a little over three fifths of an African elephant’s shoulder height.

A rounded reference value used by this game. Specimens, models and measurement conventions can vary.

Replay this comparison →
Play Classic for this date →
Pop CultureFive comparisons · September 16, 2026Reveal answers +
01

King Kong vs Statue of Liberty

1.104×
Reference · height
Statue of Liberty 93 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.104. The target’s height is approximately 1.104× the reference’s height.

The MonsterVerse version of King Kong stands a little taller than the Statue of Liberty including its pedestal.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
02

Jurassic Park T. rex vs Blue whale

0.408×
Reference · length
Blue whale 29.9 m
Target · length
Jurassic Park T. rex 12.2 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.408. The target’s length is approximately 0.408× the reference’s length.

The Jurassic Park T. rex is portrayed at a little over two fifths of a record-size blue whale’s length.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
03

King Kong vs Eiffel Tower

0.3112×
Reference · height
Eiffel Tower 330 m
Target · height
King Kong 102.7 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.3112. The target’s height is approximately 0.3112× the reference’s height.

King Kong’s 2021 screen height is a little under one third of the Eiffel Tower.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
04

RX-78-2 Gundam vs City bus

1.5×
Reference · length
City bus 12 m
Target · height
RX-78-2 Gundam 18 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.5. The target’s height is approximately 1.5× the reference’s length.

An 18-metre mobile suit would stand about one and a half city-bus lengths high.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
05

Smaug vs Football pitch

1.048×
Reference · length
Football pitch 105 m
Target · length
Smaug 110 m

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.048. The target’s length is approximately 1.048× the reference’s length.

A commonly cited screen-scale estimate makes Smaug roughly as long as a standard football pitch.

A representative screen or reference scale. Sizes can change between continuities.

Replay this comparison →
Play Pop Culture for this date →
GeographyFive comparisons · September 16, 2026Reveal answers +
01

Italy vs Egypt

1.086×
Reference · north–south span
Egypt 1,105 km
Target · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.086. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.086× the reference’s north–south span.

Italy’s full north–south reach is only a little longer than Egypt’s.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
02

Madagascar vs Italy

1.333×
Reference · north–south span
Italy 1,200 km
Target · north–south span
Madagascar 1,600 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.333. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.333× the reference’s north–south span.

Madagascar runs about one third farther north to south than the Italian peninsula and islands.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
03

Japan vs United Kingdom

3.109×
Reference · north–south span
United Kingdom 965 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 3.109. The target’s north–south span is approximately 3.109× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s long island arc spans a little over three times the United Kingdom from north to south.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
04

Japan vs New Zealand

1.875×
Reference · north–south span
New Zealand 1,600 km
Target · north–south span
Japan 3,000 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 1.875. The target’s north–south span is approximately 1.875× the reference’s north–south span.

Japan’s island chain spans nearly twice New Zealand’s overall north–south reach.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
05

Chile vs Brazil

0.9866×
Reference · east–west span
Brazil 4,328 km
Target · north–south span
Chile 4,270 km

Correct ratio: target ÷ reference = 0.9866. The target’s north–south span is approximately 0.9866× the reference’s east–west span.

Chile’s north–south reach is surprisingly close to Brazil’s broad east–west extent.

Approximate linear extent along the named axis; this does not compare land area.

Replay this comparison →
Play Geography for this date →
Daily EstimateOne numerical questionReveal answer +